On my old Athlon box I was even booting into XP with a very fast Hitachi 7200RPM 320GB hard drive. Under XP I even followed Black Viper's guide for MS services to disable in Windows XP SP3. Under services.msc I disable all third party services I don't use leaving Bonjour, Flexnet Licensing, Anti-virus and AMD external event utility (for my video card).
I disable everything in MSCONFIG startup items except anti-virus, itunes helper, microsoft intellitype, and Daemon Tools.
CNET DAEMON TOOLS FREE
I always keep my machines free of garbage boot items.
CNET DAEMON TOOLS PRO
But both my Pentium Dual Core and old Athlon 64 boot much faster into Windows 7 RC than they did with Windows XP Pro or Vista. As I do this three or four times a day and cut the power on my six outlet switch (why waste the electricity).
One of the things I love about Win 7 is how quickly it boots and shuts down.
CNET DAEMON TOOLS HOW TO
Sure, Microsoft doesn't sell beautiful toys like iMovie, but they sure as hell know how to deliver powerful products for their business customers.
Windows and Windows Server are the most versatile and customizable platforms available, no matter what the Open Source fraction wants you to believe. And most of those features have nothing to do with eye candy but run under the hood and in background processes, and they are what makes Windows the best platform for business and enterprise IT - both on the desktop AND the server. It's just that a CONSUMER does not care for or even see most of those features, because they were implemented for being used in large enterprise networks - a place where OS X sucks completely. " seems to be so much behind?" Are you sure? Windows 7 Ultimate Edition has so much more features than OS X Snow Leopard that in direct comparison, OS X looks "so much behind". Just look at how many processes and services/daemons a current desktop operating system has to launch during the boot process, and also keep in mind that there are strict dependencies between those processes that must be taken care of. What do you guys/gals think about this? I know it makes me happy with my choice.įirst of all, booting a complex system like Windows 7 or Snow Leopard or Ubuntu Linux or IBM MVS or Solaris is NOT a simple task. (BTW, the installs of SL on my iMac and Macbook were both upgrades done to old installs of Leopard, at least a year on each.) Of even bigger surprise to me was the way Windows slowed down over time (win-rot) - down to 2:34 after just 3 months. The most shocking thing to me, though, was that my four+ year old PowerBook could boot quicker (with 512MB RAM and a 4200rpm hard drive) than either of the Windows boxes they tested.
My Macbook (Core2Duo 2.1GHz, 4GB RAM, 160GB 5400rpm drive, running Snow Leopard 10.6.1) from a cold start -> 0:53 (connecting to wifi)Īnd I don't exactly have cutting-edge hardware, either! My iMac (Core2Duo 2.0GHz, 3GB RAM, 160GB 7200rpm drive, running Snow Leopard 10.6.1) from a cold start -> 0:40 (connecting to wired ethernet) My PowerBook G4 (1.33GHz, 512MB RAM, 60GB 4200rpm drive, running Tiger 10.4.11) from a cold start -> 1:01 (including connecting to my wifi and loading Safari to Google) Out of sheer curiosity, I did a bit of informal testing on my personal machines. For that matter, I find it hard to believe the boot times that are listed for their Vista and 7 machines they compared (1:06 vs. Now, I realize that boot times are not everything, but I find it hard to believe that boot times (at least according to this study) are slower for 7 than Vista. Just saw this crazy article on CNet today:
0 kommentar(er)
